Skip to content

Data

Registrar & Host Takedown Responsiveness Index

Takedown-speed marketing is unstandardized: vendors quote averages measured from different starting points, on different case mixes, with different definitions of done. This index publishes defined metrics instead — median time-to-acknowledgment and median time-to-resolution observed across real Impersona cases, next to what providers themselves declare. Observed and declared numbers are never mixed.

Time to acknowledgment

Elapsed time between our takedown submission to a registrar or host and the first recorded acknowledgment from that provider.

Time to resolution

Elapsed time between submission and the case being resolved — the impersonating content taken down or otherwise neutralized.

Observed responsiveness

Medians across real Impersona remediation cases, all customers combined. Providers appear once they have at least 3 measurable cases. Last updated 2026-07-02.

Observed data is still accumulating

We only publish a provider once it has at least 3 measurable cases, so no observed medians meet the bar yet. Rather than pad the table with estimates, we leave it empty — the provider-declared expectations below are clearly labeled as exactly that.

Provider-declared expectations

SLA expectations from provider documentation and community experience for the providers our remediation workflow integrates with. These are expectations, not guarantees — listed separately so they are never confused with observed data.

ProviderChannelsIntegrationDeclared ackDeclared resolutionReported success
Cloudflare (Registrar / Trust & Safety)registrarLive API (tested)4 h24 h85%
GoDaddy (Registrar Abuse API)registrarAPI (sandbox-tested)24 h3 d75%
Namecheap (Email Abuse Report)registrar · email_abuseEmail (best-effort)2 d4 d65%
Porkbun (Email Abuse Report)registrar · email_abuseEmail (best-effort)24 h2 d70%
Dynadot (Email Abuse Report)registrar · email_abuseEmail (best-effort)24 h3 d65%
Cloudflare (Hosting / CDN Abuse)host · cdnAPI (sandbox-tested)4 h24 h80%
Fastly (Hosting / CDN Abuse)host · cdnEmail (best-effort)24 h3 d70%
Akamai (Hosting / CDN Abuse)host · cdnEmail (best-effort)24 h3 d70%
AWS CloudFront (Hosting / CDN Abuse)host · cdnEmail (best-effort)2 d5 d60%
Vercel (Email Abuse Report)hostEmail (best-effort)12 h2 d80%
Netlify (Email Abuse Report)hostEmail (best-effort)24 h3 d75%
DigitalOcean (Email Abuse Report)hostEmail (best-effort)24 h3 d70%
Hetzner (Email Abuse Report)hostEmail (best-effort)24 h3 d70%
Google Safe Browsing (Web Risk)browser_blocklistAPI (sandbox-tested)1 h4 h90%
PhishTank (Community Blocklist)browser_blocklistAPI (sandbox-tested)2 h12 h85%

Methodology

Observed metrics aggregate every Impersona remediation case with recorded submission timestamps, across all customers. Time-to-acknowledgment is the elapsed time between our takedown submission to a provider and that provider's first recorded acknowledgment. Time-to-resolution is the elapsed time between submission and case resolution. Values are medians in hours; each median is published only once at least 3 measurable cases exist for that specific metric — a provider whose acknowledgment or resolution sample falls below that threshold has that metric shown as unavailable rather than published. Only provider-level aggregates are released — never case, domain, or customer details. Declared figures are the SLA expectations from provider documentation and community experience that Impersona uses for routing; they are expectations, not guarantees, and are kept separate so observed and declared numbers are never mixed.

See who would be handling your takedowns

Run a free brand check to find the lookalike domains targeting your brand — and which registrars and hosts they sit behind.